Which novel teaching strategy is most recommended in medical education? A systematic review and network meta-analysis | BMC Medical Education

0
Which novel teaching strategy is most recommended in medical education? A systematic review and network meta-analysis | BMC Medical Education
  • Waqas A, Khan S, Sharif W, Khalid U, Ali A. Association of academic stress with sleeping difficulties in medical students of a Pakistani medical school: a cross sectional survey. PeerJ. 2015;3: e840.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah M, Hasan S, Malik S, Sreeramareddy CT. Perceived stress, sources and severity of stress among medical undergraduates in a Pakistani medical school. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzubeir MA, Elzubeir KE, Magzoub ME. Stress and coping strategies among Arab medical students: towards a research agenda. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2010;23(1):355.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Acad Med. 2006;81(4):354–73.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh AM, Al-Tawil NG, Al-Hadithi TS. Teaching methods in Hawler College of Medicine in Iraq: a qualitative assessment from teachers’ perspectives. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:59.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Wu X, Liu D, Zhang C, Xie H, Wang Y, Xiao L. Practice and exploration of the “student-centered” multielement fusion teaching mode in human anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022;44(1):15–23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HC, Wang C. Reform direction of medical education in China: implementing “competency-based” medical education. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(17):3203–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Curro FA, Mozaffari MS, Stevens RL, Warner W. The Trajectory of Pharmacology Education in Dentistry: Is a Course Correction Needed? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016;37(8):508–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao CL, Ren H, Chen HQ, Liu WH, Luo ZY, Li WR, Luo JQ. Multidimensional evaluation of teaching strategies for pharmacology based on a comprehensive analysis involving 21,269 students. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1145456.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeri F, Eperjesi F, Woods C, Bandlitz S, Kumar Bhootra A, Joshi MR, Nagra M, Schweizer H, Naroo SA. Evidence-based teaching in contact lenses education: Teaching and learning strategies. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023;46(2): 101822.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Zeng D, Wang J, Xu K, Li L. Effectiveness of bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary teaching strategy in Chinese medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9: 975229.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu K, Ma RJ, Ma C, Zheng QK, Sun ZG. Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):447.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipiyaruk K, Kaewsirirat P, Santiwong P. Technology-enhanced simulation-based learning in orthodontic education: A scoping review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2023;28(3): e2321354.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Han S. Flipped classroom: Challenges and benefits of using social media in English language teaching and learning. Front Psychol. 2022;13: 996294.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Banna MM, Whitlow M, McNelis AM. Flipping around the classroom: Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing students’ satisfaction and achievement. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:41–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Faisal R, Bahadur S, Shinwari L. Problem-based learning in comparison with lecture-based learning among medical students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(6):650–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau M, Arruzza E, Johnson N. Simulation-based education for medical radiation students: A scoping review. J Med Radiat Sci. 2022;69(3):367–81.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterpu I, Herling L, Nordquist J, Rotgans J, Acharya G. Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students-a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):18.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, He L, Deng W, Zhu J, Su A, Zhang Y. The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):381.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, You J, Wu J, Hu C, Shao L. The Effect of Microteaching Combined with the BOPPPS Model on Dental Materials Education for Predoctoral Dental Students. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(5):567–74.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon DT, Blake RL. Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Acad Med. 1993;68(7):550–63.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhou L, Liu X, Liu L, Wu Y, Zhao Z, Yi D, Yi D. The effectiveness of the problem-based learning teaching model for use in introductory Chinese undergraduate medical courses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3): e0120884.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyzois I, Claffey N, Mattheos N. Problem-based learning in academic health education. A systematic literature review. Eur J Dent Educ. 2010;14(1):55–64.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend G. Problem-based learning interventions in a traditional curriculum are an effective learning tool. Evid Based Dent. 2011;12(4):115–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellaway RH, Pusic M, Yavner S, Kalet AL. Context matters: emergent variability in an effectiveness trial of online teaching modules. Med Educ. 2014;48(4):386–96.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y, Hunt RH. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(5):1086–92.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell JE. The PRISMA extension for network meta-analysis: bringing clarity and guidance to the reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):797–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, Ioannidis JP, Straus S, Thorlund K, Jansen JP, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Zhu D, Wang X, Liu T, Wang L, Fan X, Gong H. Effects of six teaching strategies on medical students: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2024;14(1): e079716.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1–67.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1087–91.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins JPT TJ CJ, Cumpston M.: Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2, 2021. Available: [Accessed 7 Aug 2021].

  • Hu D, O’Connor AM, Wang C, Sargeant JM, Winder CB. How to Conduct a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:271.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • van Valkenhoef G, Dias S, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2016;7(1):80–93.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Papakonstantinou T, Nikolakopoulou A, Higgins JPT, Egger M, Salanti G. CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta-analysis. Campbell Syst Rev. 2020;16(1): e1080.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolakopoulou A, Higgins JPT, Papakonstantinou T, Chaimani A, Del Giovane C, Egger M, Salanti G. CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17(4): e1003082.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt J, Huebner B. Dependence of learning outcomes in flipped and lecture classrooms on review questions: A randomized controlled trial and observational study. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(12): e0279296.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923–58.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt J, Tricco AC, Straus S, Veroniki AA, Naglie G, Drucker AM. Research Techniques Made Simple: Network Meta-Analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(1):4-12.e11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cen XY, Hua Y, Niu S, Yu T. Application of case-based learning in medical student education: a meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25(8):3173–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman T, Bertrand B, Greer A, Pettus A, Jennings J, Wall-Bassett E, Babatunde OT. Case-based learning facilitates critical thinking in undergraduate nutrition education: students describe the big picture. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(3):378–88.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguayo S, Benso B, Cantarutti C, Ortuño D, Véliz C. Case-based learning to teach scientific thinking to dental students. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(Suppl 3):1734–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsanosi SM. A New Vision of Teaching Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics for Undergraduate Medical Students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;13:567–75.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Xu J, Wang H, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Zou L. Effects of problem-based learning in Chinese radiology education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(9): e0069.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Lu X. The effectiveness of problem-based learning in pediatric medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(2): e14052.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Trullàs JC, Blay C, Sarri E, Pujol R. Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):104.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng QM, Li YY, Yin Q, Zhang N, Wang YP, Li GX, Sun ZG. The effectiveness of problem-based learning compared with lecture-based learning in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):546.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Wang W, Li Z, Wang H, Liu X. Problem-based or lecture-based learning, old topic in the new field: a meta-analysis on the effects of PBL teaching method in Chinese standardized residency training. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):221.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CX, Ouyang WW, Wang XW, Chen D, Jiang ZL. Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(16): e19687.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera LI, Tellez TE, D’Ottavio AE. Implementing a problem-based learning curriculum in an Argentinean medical school: implications for developing countries. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):798–801.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Almaiah MA, Al-Khasawneh A, Althunibat A. Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2020;25(6):5261–80.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Montepara CA, Woods AG, Wolfgang KW. Problem-based learning case studies: Delivery of an educational method and perceptions at two schools of pharmacy in Italy. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021;13(6):717–22.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S Jr, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, Levine AI. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76(4):330–43.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulyadi M, Tonapa SI, Rompas SSJ, Wang RH, Lee BO. Effects of simulation technology-based learning on nursing students’ learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;107: 105127.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cant RP, Cooper SJ. The value of simulation-based learning in pre-licensure nurse education: A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;27:45–62.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh PJ, Jeon KD, Koh MS. The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(5):e6–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin S, Park JH, Kim JH. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(1):176–82.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni J, Wu P, Huang X, Zhang F, You Z, Chang Q, Liao L. Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(8): e0273693.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pripp AH: [Meta-analysis: publication bias]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2021, 141.

  • Burks TN. Improving Student Attitudes and Academic Performance in Introductory Biology Using a Project-Based Learning Community. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022;23(1):e00216–00221.

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *